[Movie Review] : Astounding Tale of Poetic Love and Hedonic Lust

My first question soon after I stepped out of the theatre- What was all the fuss about? In no way has the Rajput pride been tarnished or tainted in this movie. The protests seemed completely flaccid because the movie actually generated the exact opposite reaction from me. My respect went skyrocketing for the Rajput and their principles and ethics. Moreover, the Rajput flag has clearly been held up high throughout the movie and shows no sign of evil or flawed actions on their part.
Credits - bollymoviereviewz.com

Integrity, lust, valor, beauty, tyranny coupled with hedonism and a highly poetic idea of love is Padmaavat. Let’s begin with some technicalities, the cinematography. The movie begins with an extra-diegetic narrative like most period dramas. The most astonishing work according to me is how the lighting and color scheme keeps changing according to the character on screen. When Maharawal Ratan Singh (Shahid Kapoor) is on screen, the colors and lighting emit a regal aura of strong values and principles and when Alauddin Khilji (Ranveer Singh) is on screen they emit a barbaric and unhinged ravenous thirst for blood and flesh. The best part is the amalgamation of both when they face off, the cinematography is so perfect that both ends of the moral gamut are displayed flawlessly by Bhansali and he truly deserves credit for that. Be that as it may, the impacts in the war scenes don't meet the desires raised by a film of this scale. Additionally, the melodies don't do much to promote the account of events other than giving visual pleasure. Yet 'Padmaavat' is engaging and enlivened with Sanjay Leela Bhansali's stroke of artsy splendor.

Padmaavat, in view of a poem composed by Sufi writer Malik Muhammad Jayasi in 1540, portrays how Rajput ruler Maharawal Ratan Singh (Kapoor) and heavenly beautiful and politically smart wife Padmavati (Padukone) endeavor to safeguard their hundreds of years old kingdom from a tyrannous and savage crazy individual named Alauddin Khilji (Ranveer), the aspiring Sultan of Delhi who is set on alluring Padmavati and commanding India. Finally when Khilji triumphs. Padmavati picks Jauhar (self-immolation) over enslavement — a demonstration regarded courageous and executed as an act of devotion to her husband. In those eras, the practice of Jauhar was considered heroic and godly which is a very sad state of affairs, to be honest.
Credits - bollywoodlife.com

Sanjay Leela Bhansali unravels his controversial period drama with Jalaluddin Khilji (Raza Murad) observing his young nephew's mannerisms. Alauddin is requested to bring an ostrich feather instead he brings a chained ostrich. This is the first scene of the movie creating a build up to display Alauddin’s savage level. The crux of the movie is that His libido is bouncing up and down to see Rani Padmavati (Deepika Padukone) after a disheartened and banished priest of Mewar, Raghav Chetan waxes persuasively about her magnificence, contrasting it with the moon and the sea. Fortunately, Padmavati, the princess of Singhal, is already hitched to Rawal Ratan Singh (Shahid Kapoor) who austerely lives by the Rajput code of morals. How would we know? Since he continues repeating the word Rajput parrot like throughout the film. In any case, the genuine inconvenience begins in the film's last extend, screening a sensational demonstration of "Jauhar," where the ladies in a manner of stealing away the oppressors win over them and avoiding being debilitated by assault or oppression by the Khilji empire, set themselves ablaze. Regardless of whether you appreciate the film's specialty, what can be said to a spectator frustrated at the possibility of a lady self-immolating as a method to show her stance? I identify and share the sentiments of those viewers who believe that "Ladies have the privilege to live, regardless of the passing of their spouses and they do not require male defenders, owners or controllers of their sexuality or whatever they comprehend the men to be. Ladies have the privilege to live free whether their men are living or not. "Padmaavat" is an uncommon work of craftsmanship that is both capable and repulsive

Bhansali realizes that his greatest resource is the myth around his lead characters and he tries his best to investigate that. You don't simply bump into any of the significant characters. There is an appropriate development around all the three noteworthy players, Khilji, Ratan Singh, and Padmavati. Padmaavat is furthermore a garrulous film. In the event that Ratan Singh isn't short of constraining his ideals down our throats, Ranveer Singh's Khilji likewise clarifies his uncouthness and love for double-crossing in the same number of words

"Padmaavat" appears to exist to demonstrate the magnificence of Jayasi's original romantic tale. Bhansali draws out the sizzling onscreen chemistry between Kapoor and Padukone and discovers sensuality even when the characters are wrapped in yards of gold-weaved silks and hung in pearls and valuable jewels. Ranveer is all kohl-rimmed eyes and scar-faced, in contrast to Kapoor's respectable courage, it is a perfect dichotomy.Conversely, through a few key scenes, we find Bhansali accentuate Alauddin's voracity and over the top hedonic character. Ranveer's strappingly dedicated acting influences you to trust in his character's perniciousness. Ranveer's moxie influences you to trust him even when he growls, scowls, and displays beastly aggression and hostility. His hyper-energetic dancing is particularly noteworthy. The set for the last song of the movie is rousing to the point that it emerges as the best melodic number in a film brimming with solid vocal exhibitions and effectively thought out movement. Ranveer Singh entrances you with his non-verbal acts of communication, frightening eyes and a spirited fanatical walk that go on to show the amount of preparation that has gone into his role.
Credits - thenational.ae

Padmaavat's luxurious castle insides and classically moved background scores add a tinge of sophistication and grace to the film without overwhelming it. The movie tries to attract you and influence you to see the world through the eyes of its fundamental characters, to better comprehend the appeal of values that men and women of this generation think obsolete
P.S –
Beyond all the love and war, there are also very subtle, dim, peculiar and layered scenes amongst Khilji and Kafur. Bhansali leaves questions in your brain about their characters. Jim Sarbh (Kafur), with his intonation and particular quirky trait, demonstrates to us the diverse aspects of human affection. In one of the scenes, he is touching Khilji's back with a fan made of peacock plumes, making it all the more difficult to decode this relationship between master and slave.Sarbh’s acting prowess is additionally overwhelming in the scene where Kafur looks from behind a window ornament as Khilji is getting steamy with a lady. The sexual connotation influences us to see their relationship in another light.

1 Comments Write your comment

    1. Loading...